Anna Pavlova's performance of The Dying Swan. Possibly the only footage of her dancing in the public domain
This is not a return to reviewing. It’s been just over
two months since I announced a sabbatical, and I intend to stick to it. This is
a rediscovery of a review written many years ago of the book that, in a way,
introduced me to the world of performing arts. More specifically, dance. I may
not understand much about the technicalities of Indian or Western ballet even
now, but thanks to Richard Austin’s delightful book, I felt like I had an
insight into the life and art of those driven, talented women (and men) who use
their bodies to express themselves and create visuals that enthrall us.
Profiling a great
artiste is never easy. Very few biographies of the truly artistically gifted
have come even close to doing justice to the brilliance of their subjects. The
task undertaken by Richard Austin in “The Art of the Dancer”, of
profiling six of the finest exponents of an art so visual as dance becomes,
then, positively Herculean. Dance is an enthralling form of art, comprising
beauty of form and technique, of harmony with the music and of dramatic
expression. Encapsulating the grandeur of this moving, living art form in mere
words is like trying to compress the water of the Nile in a wine-glass. Having
said that, Richard Austin does an admirable job of trying. This slim book is a
treasure-trove of nuggets of information and insights into the lives of six
artistes who were, in the strongest sense of the word, stars. Writing in very
elegant prose, Austin tries to shed some light on the obscure facets of the
lives of the dancers, their relationships with parents, friends and lovers,
their impoverished backgrounds, their early training and how all these aspects
contributed to making them the great artistes they were.
The book is divided into
six sections, each devoted to one of the dancers.
 |
| Marie Taglioni |
The first dancer
profiled is the French sensation Marie
Taglioni (1804-1884). Austin writes an interesting account of her glorious
dancing and very pedestrian nature, creating a fascinating story of a woman whose
failings were as human as her dancing was divine. Driven hard by a father who
lived vicariously through his brilliant daughter, Taglioni, like Mozart before
her, found solace in her dance, a rare gift that raised the ordinary
choreography of her father to sublime levels. The first dancer to have an
admirer throw a bouquet of flowers at the stage, she’d go on to be the
recipient of the most extravagant gifts, inspite of her less-than-prepossessing
personal appearance. Raised from extreme poverty to immense wealth and then
reduced to poverty again by the depredations of her father, Marie’s story is of
a person who was constantly striving to overcome her limitations, and
invariably did.
 |
| Marie Taglioni (lithograph) |
 |
| Anna Pavlova |
He then moves on to the
incomparable Anna Pavlova (1881-1931).
Austin does not try to describe her dancing, and with good reason – by all
accounts, such an attempt would have been futile. To all with even a passing
acquaintance with the ballet, she will always be The Dancer, a gift of the Gods
who chose to shine on the stages of our world like a comet, leaving in her tail
a tradition of dance that is echoed in the movements and aspirations of
thousands of aspiring ballerinas in schools from San Francisco to St.
Petersburg.
 |
| Pavlova, from the poster for a performance |
Austin rather chooses to describe the nature of this woman who was
capricious in her ways but steadfast in her determination, jealous but
appreciative of her rivals, who dreamt in equal measure of being a princess and
of taking the joy of dance to as many people as possible. Anna Pavlova learned
early that she brought joy into people’s lives, that when they watched her
dance, they left their sorrows, their troubles behind, and lost themselves in
the beauty and magic of her art. She spent the rest of her life taking that art
around the world, dancing in packed bull-rings in Mexico, in the middle of
bloody street-fighting in Cuba, in places as far from the nerve-center of
classical dance as India and New Zealand. The Dancer’s life is beyond explanation
or justification, she just IS, and Austin manages to do an admirable job of
chronicling this fact.
 |
| Anna Pavlova as The Swan |
 |
| Isadora Duncan |
Pavlova’s non-classical
contemporary, Isadora Duncan (1877-1927)
presents another dilemma to Austin – a stormy petrel, a non-conformist, a
free-style dancer who won over the most discerning audiences of Russia and
Europe, the communist (famously waving a red scarf and baring her breast on
stage in Boston, proclaiming “This is red! So am I!”) defied categorization as she defied tradition
and the greatness of her art, unlike that of the other dancers in this book, has
largely died with her. Does Austin quite get into the mind of the eccentric,
egotistic genius that this Irish-American beauty was? Could anyone? But he serves up, in his chronicle of her life and her freakish death, a picture of
the tempestuous Duncan, her foibles, her passionate nature and her endlessly
destructive love-affairs.
 |
| Isadora Duncan, forever free |
 |
| Olga Spessivtzeva as The Swan |
Olga Spessivtzeva, (1895-1991), the classical ice-princess
is beautifully depicted by Austin, as he draws parallels and contrasts between
her pristine frigidity and Pavlova’s sensual warmth. Olga’s almost detached
approach to her art, seeing the dance as an end in itself, rather than as a
means of pleasing an audience, is brought out in Austin’s account of her
endless hours spent practicing in the studio. Her final descent into madness and
recovery is surprisingly glossed over in a few paragraphs, but this profile
remains one of the most intriguing pictures of the mysterious woman with the
unpronounceable name.
 |
| Olga Spessivtzeva as Giselle, a young girl driven mad by grief. Foreboding. |
 |
| Tamara Karasivena as Giselle. Mercifully not foreboding. |
Austin presents Tamara Karasivina (1885-1978) in
probably the most positive light of all – possibly because she was the most
well-balanced, almost ‘normal’ inasmuch as an artiste of that calibre can be
termed ‘normal’. Karasivena was the best actress and surely the most versatile
dancer of her time, a fact Austin brings out beautifully in his profile of her.
Painting a portrait of a great artiste and beauty who was surprisingly
untouched by the arrogance of the typical diva and lived a happy, fulfilled
life - a startling rarity, sadly.
 |
| Karasivena and Njinsky |
 |
| Dame Alicia Markova |
The final portrait is of
Alicia Markova, (1910-2004) the
first great modern ballerina, a child prodigy who was the toast of London at
the age of 10 and continued to enthrall audiences for another thirty years.
Alicia was different from the other dancers…an enigma of a different sort.
Technically flawless from a very early age, she took some time to realize her
self-expression as a dancer, to infuse her own spirit into her performances. Austin
presents an interesting story of a subdued, docile nature that lived and
blossomed into its own under the lights of the stage.
 |
| Dame Alicia Markova |
The Art of the Dancer is essential reading for anyone with an
interest in the classical dance forms, but I would also like to recommend it to
the casual reader and for those who wish to improve their own writing style.
The book serves as a master-class in the use of prose to describe motion,
showing in a rather poor light the attempts made by more celebrated writers of
fiction.
In any case, for a
generation that, like myself, has been brought up on physical education drills
masquerading as dance, a peek into the lives of the true geniuses of the art
can only be beneficial. It makes one long for something better, something more
than what life in the mundane world has to offer. And that can only be a good
thing.
I normally link to the buying page of books I review. Perhaps
a commentary on what we have become as a society and in our relation to art,
this book is no longer available on any major portal. Come to think of it, I
found it myself only by merest happenstance. Still, if you do find it, hold on
to it. It looks like this:
 |
| Prized possession. You may look, but you can't touch. |
