The thought of
‘reviewing’ a book like Emma sounds ridiculous. A book written
200 years ago has surely been analysed to death by the serious students of
literature and could hold little interest for the contemporary readers.
And yet, Jane Austen’s
work continues to be adapted to screens, big and small – Emma itself was made into 3 TV series
(1972, 1997 and 2009), at least one movie (1996) that I am aware of, and into Clueless, one of the finest
rom-coms ever (in my humble opinion), which took the characters and situations
into 1990’s Beverly Hills with brilliant felicity.
Poster of Clueless, the 90's take on Emma |
Bollywood ripped Clueless off
to make Aisha starring
Sonam Kapoor, and all I can say about that is while Alicia Silverstone made a
brilliant Emma Woodhouse; Sonam Kapoor rarely even makes a good Sonam Kapoor.
Poster of Aisha, which had the baffling tagline "Don't be Cupid" |
So – well, why not?
Emma is set in the town of Highbury, a small
town near London, and the drama plays out around the interaction between the
four most prominent families of the town —
Characters
The Knightley family, living at Donwell, the
noblest and richest family in Highbury, comprising the elder brother George (who is single) and his brother John
(married to Isabella).
The Weston family, living at Randalls,
comprising the widower Captain Weston, whose
marriage to Emma’s governess, Anne Taylor, kicks
off the story. Captain Weston’s son Frank has been raised by the family of his
deceased wife, but enters the story later.
The Bates, quite well-born, but since
descended to poverty, they live in a small lodging in town, mother and
daughter. The grand-daughter, Miss Jane Fairfax, is
the only woman in Highbury to rival Emma in looks and accomplishment, but her
poverty means she is expected to have to settle for life as a governess at
best, if not worse.
And lastly, the two
single, attractive people in town – the Vicar, Mr. Elton, and the
illegitimate daughter of unknown provenance, Harriet Smith, Emma’s protégée.
The characters are
well-defined, Emma makes for a brilliant protagonist, and most of the time, we
are experiencing the story through her eyes. Spoilt and capricious, Emma is
nonetheless intelligent and thoroughly good-natured, but it is the former
qualities that shape the first half of the book. As Emma plays Cupid with the
two single acquaintances she has – Harriet and Mr. Elton – Jane Austen lays
before us a superlative social comedy. Here is vanity, flattery and naiveté,
here is witty repartee and heartfelt concern, the stolid social rules of
Victorian England, the social independence afforded to a rich beauty like Emma, the stifling
restrictions imposed on a poor beauty like Jane or Harriet.
Highlights
Playing always within
the rules of social morality and class distinction, with many a wink to the
hypocrisy of the upper classes, Austen brings forth sparkling dialogues, subtle
hints (unseen in the first reading, devilishly clever in the second), and in some
places, a wry commentary on her own characters that make this novel deserve an
unhurried read. Like a fine wine, every Chapter deserves to be savoured, but I
would especially highlight certain portions as being particularly brilliant -
one early in the story, when Isabella Knightley and her husband are visiting at
Hartfield, and another when the families are gathered at the Randalls and Mr
Weston and another character rattle on about their respective favourite topics.
Mr Weston wishes to speak of his son, the person he is speaking to would rather
speak about her rich brother-in-law – and they each go about it, mostly
ignoring what the other says, but their dialogue still retains a tangential
coherence that I could only marvel at when it was over.
Emma also has Austen’s nod to hard-headed
economics. Here too, Emma does not commit her heart to
such emotions as love without a keen sense of social and economic equality, she
may make thoughtless mistakes when trying to ascertain the romantic
inclinations of her friends, but she is well aware of her own preferences. Like
Elizabeth Bennet, a visit to the property she might occupy were she to marry is
instrumental in deciding whom she does marry, and any suggestion
that she might marry for love – or at least only for love – are quashed quicker
than a mercy petition in India.
Another criticism could
be the hardening of social ranks – the families of Highbury are ranked as
neatly in Emma’s mind (and for most of Emma, we are
experiencing Highbury through her, making this an 80% unreliable-narrator sort
of book) as a deck of cards. The Cox family are upstarts, despite their wealth,
the Bates are always ‘unfortunate’ despite their unfailing good nature, Jane
Fairfax is better than Emma at almost everything she does, but the ‘first
place’ in society must always be hers, her father is a truly selfish
hypochondriac (and she knows it), but everyone must pay him due respect, even her
brother-in-law (In fact, the first conversation I have referred to above is
made amusing mostly by the efforts taken by Emma and the elder Mr Knightley to
prevent father and son-in-law from having an argument).
The gentleman landlord —
Knightley of Donwell — is first in society, the gentleman invalid — Emma’s
father — is second, the retired Captain — Weston of Randall — is third. Those
in respectable professions, lawyers and clergymen like Mr Elton, mainly – may
claim a place at the social table. Descended nobility like the Bates family can
make up the numbers. Tradesmen like the Coxes and Fords, no matter how rich, cannot
claim the same privileges — not in this generation, at least — and must always
feel grateful to be noticed by the presiding troika of society. And as for the
farmers, even those like the Martins who own their land, they are socially
beneath notice, below even Mrs Goddard who runs a school for girls and her
boarders (of whom Harriet Smith is one); Emma cannot think of visiting them
except as charity, and they are unlikely to ever score an invite to a gathering
at Donwell, Hartfield or the Randalls.
Austen herself was
closest in social rank to the Bates’, and in her depiction of contemporary
society, it is perhaps unfair to see an endorsement of the rigid caste system
of the time, but rather a stoic acceptance of reality. After all, if Jane
Fairfax is Austen’s little nod to herself, let’s not forget that she ends up
with perhaps the best match of all.
In Conclusion
Finally, though Austen
said “I am going to take a heroine whom no one but myself will much like,” I
think it’s impossible not to like Emma the book. This was my second
reading – the first took place largely in trains, buses and lines to file
Income-tax returns. This time, it has hit the spot.
TL:DR: Ignore the labels,
ignore those who suggest it’s too long, and give a kick to any man who
dismisses it as chick-lit. If you savour delicious prose, if you love witty
dialogue, if you can laugh at shades of yourself in characters created in 1815,
go ahead and buy it here:
I will need to pick up EMMA once again :).. Indeed a wonderful review.
ReplyDeleteOh this sounds delightful! This is going to be my next Austen read. :D Thank you!
ReplyDelete